Donald Patrick Eckler is a Partner in Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP’s Chicago office and is Co-Chair of the firm's Professional Liability / Errors and Omissions national practice section, Vice-Chair of the firm’s Midwest Coverage Team, Vice-Chair of the firm's Transactional Risks/Representations & Warranties practice team, and a member of the firm’s Appellate Advocacy Section.
Kate has spent her career defending and counseling individuals and companies accused of not doing their jobs right. Primarily in professional liability, bad faith and sexual misconduct matters, Kate represents clients in many different fields - legal, insurance, accounting, real estate, education and more. She never loses sight of the fact that her job is to close the case as efficiently as possible so that her clients can get back to doing their jobs.
Reptile theory has migrated from a courtroom rhetorical trick into a financed, industrialized verdict-inflation engine — and defense counsel who still treat it as a deposition annoyance are conceding ground before the case is filed. Third-party litigation funding, alternative business structures, and private equity capital now underwrite the aggressive marketing and juror conditioning that prime panels to punish rather than adjudicate, and the resulting nuclear verdicts are landing in jurisdictions that produced none a decade ago. Any litigator defending professionals, insurers, or businesses is already exposed, often without recognizing that opposing counsel's "safety rule" framing was engineered upstream. This program traces Reptile mechanics across the full litigation lifecycle, supplying pretrial motion strategies to bar inflammatory framing, tactical deposition objections and witness preparation against loaded safety-rule questioning, and voir dire and cross-examination methods that reframe the argument on defense terms. Attendees leave able to spot Reptile conditioning early, build a procedural record against it, and dismantle its fear-based appeal before a jury ever deliberates.
What Will You Learn
Attorneys will learn how Reptile theory operates, how industry shifts fuel nuclear verdicts, and how to counter Reptile tactics across pretrial, depositions, and trial.
What Will You Gain
Attorneys will gain practical, stage-by-stage defense strategies to neutralize Reptile arguments, defeat deposition traps, and dismantle fear-based appeals at trial.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Date / Time: July 10, 2026
Closed-captioning available
Donald Patrick Eckler | Freeman Mathis & Gary LLP
Donald Patrick Eckler is a Partner in Freeman Mathis & Gary, LLP’s Chicago office and is Co-Chair of the firm’s Professional Liability / Errors and Omissions national practice section, Vice-Chair of the firm’s Midwest Coverage Team, Vice-Chair of the firm’s Transactional Risks/Representations & Warranties practice team, and a member of the firm’s Appellate Advocacy Section. He is a highly experienced litigator who focuses his practice on professionals, insurers, and businesses in disputes in state and federal courts across Illinois and Indiana. In addition to working at the trial level, he has successfully represented clients in numerous appellate matters and filed several amicus briefs on behalf of defense organizations.
Mr. Eckler is active in the organized defense bar both at the state and national level. He is a past president of the PLDF and current Second Vice President of the Illinois Defense Counsel. He is on the Amicus Committee of the Defense Trial Counsel of Indiana and is a member of the DRI Third-Party Litigation Task Force. He publishes a weekly column, For the Defense, in the Chicago Daily Law Bulletin, is the civil practice columnist for the IDC Quarterly, and is a frequent contributor to the PLDF Quarterly. He is a member of the Rules Committee of the Appellate Lawyers Association. He also gives an annual Illinois insurance coverage update to the Insurance Law Committee of the Chicago Bar Association. He is very active on LinkedIn with three posts daily focusing on developments in the law in Illinois and Indiana and trends impacting civil justice. Finally, he co-hosts the Podium and Panel Podcast where they discuss recent oral arguments before the Illinois and Indiana courts of review, the Seventh Circuit, and the Supreme Court of the United States.
After completing his undergraduate degree, Mr. Eckler taught history and coached high school and college basketball for three years before attending law school at the University of Florida. In his final semester of law school, he served as a certified legal intern with the Public Defenders’ Office of the Eighth Judicial Circuit, where he represented defendants in misdemeanor criminal cases.
Kate S. Whitlock | McAngus Goudelock & Courie LLC
Kate has spent her career defending and counseling individuals and companies accused of not doing their jobs right. Primarily in professional liability, bad faith and sexual misconduct matters, Kate represents clients in many different fields – legal, insurance, accounting, real estate, education and more. She never loses sight of the fact that her job is to close the case as efficiently as possible so that her clients can get back to doing their jobs. Kate is skilled in both the courtroom and alternative dispute forums; having tried over 100 cases to jury verdict, bench decision or final arbitration award in state court, federal court, licensing board, arbitration and other venues. Kate handles her own cases through appeal and is called on by others to help on appeal after they receive a disappointing first level outcome.
Kate has been awarded multiple professional awards and has been recognized for years by The Best Lawyers in America© and Super Lawyers organizations. She serves in leadership roles with several national organizations, including Defense Research Institute (DRI) and Claims and Litigation Management Alliance (CLM). She is also active in several other professional organizations. To advance the legal field, Kate regularly lectures and publishes articles on emerging issues related to her litigation practice. A lifelong learner, in 2025 she earned her Masters Negotiation certification from the Harvard Law School Executive Education’s Program on Negotiation and in 2019 her Certified Litigation Management Professional (CLMP) from CLM. Kate is also passionate about mentoring the next generation of trial attorneys.
Outside of MGC, Kate gives her time to non-profit organizations in Atlanta. She has been married to her husband—who is also an attorney—for over 35 years. They have three grown non-lawyer children and two non-lawyer dogs.
SESSION 1 – Introducing the Reptile Theory | 2:00pm – 2:30pm
Examine the definition and core principles of Reptile theory, including how plaintiffs leverage fear and safety rules to influence jurors. Identify early warning signs in pleadings and correspondence, and trace the direct line connecting Reptile tactics to nuclear verdicts.
SESSION 2 – Understanding the Landscape | 2:30pm – 3:00pm
Explore how third-party litigation funding, alternative business structures, and private equity investments are reshaping the legal industry. Connect these structural shifts to aggressive marketing strategies and juror conditioning that set the stage for Reptile tactics and inflated verdicts.
BREAK | 3:00pm – 3:10pm
SESSION 3 – Countering Reptile Before Trial | 3:10pm – 3:20pm
Use written filings and motions to neutralize Reptile arguments before they reach the jury. Leverage procedural tools to limit inflammatory framing, and align defense strategy with jury psychology to counteract plaintiff pre-conditioning and fear-based narratives early in litigation.
SESSION 4 – Defeating Reptile in Depositions | 3:20pm – 3:50pm
Spot Reptile questioning techniques during discovery and deploy tactical objections to protect the record. Prepare witnesses to recognize loaded safety-rule questions, avoid traps that reinforce the plaintiff’s narrative, and maintain composure under aggressive deposition pressure.
SESSION 5 – Fighting Reptile at Trial | 3:50pm – 4:10pm
Apply voir dire approaches that uncover juror bias rooted in pre-conditioning. Use cross-examination techniques to reframe safety rule arguments on your terms, and deliver closing strategies that dismantle Reptile’s fear-based appeal and restore rational decision-making.