When a fraudulent wire transfer clears, the loss does not vanish, it lands on either the bank or the accountholder, and UCC Article 4A decides which. Courts are resolving these disputes against a backdrop of escalating fraud volume, evolving fraudster tactics, and insurers reassessing whether these transactions are even covered. Any attorney advising financial institutions or commercial accountholders is already exposed to this allocation question, often working from deposit agreements and security-procedure assumptions that recent case law has overtaken. This program maps the Article 4A framework governing sender and bank liability, the commercially reasonable security-procedure requirements an institution must meet to shift loss, and the defenses and remedies available to each party—then turns to current fraud statistics, emerging tactics, loss-reduction strategies, and the landmark cases now shaping outcomes. Attendees will leave able to assess liability exposure, evaluate whether a security procedure holds, and litigate or defend wire-fraud claims with a current doctrinal map.
What Will You Learn
Attorneys will learn how UCC Article 4A allocates liability between senders and financial institutions, the security procedure requirements involved, and the defenses and remedies available to each party.
What Will You Gain
Attorneys will gain knowledge of current bank fraud statistics, emerging fraudster tactics, strategies to reduce fraud losses, and recent and landmark cases involving bank fraud.
Key topics to be discussed:
This course is co-sponsored with myLawCLE.
Closed-captioning available
Robert F. Tom, Shareholder | Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC
Robert F. Tom is a shareholder in the Litigation and Dispute Resolution Group at Baker Donelson, where he focuses on complex commercial litigation and financial services disputes. His practice centers on representing financial institutions, lenders, and businesses in matters involving banking operations, electronic payments, commercial contracts, and fraud-related disputes. Tom regularly advises clients on issues arising from wire transfers, payment systems, and financial transactions, and he has extensive experience handling litigation involving financial institutions and banking regulations. His work includes representing clients in state and federal courts in matters involving commercial disputes, banking liability issues, and operational risks affecting financial institutions.
Shelli J. Clarkston, Of Counsel | Spencer Fane
Shelli Clarkston is a partner at Spencer Fane LLP who focuses her practice on financial services litigation, regulatory compliance, and complex commercial disputes. She represents banks, lenders, and other financial institutions in litigation involving lending transactions, fraud-related claims, and banking operations. Clarkston advises financial institutions on regulatory and operational issues affecting their business, including risk management and dispute resolution related to financial transactions. Her practice includes representing financial institutions in state and federal court and assisting clients in navigating legal issues arising from banking operations and financial services regulations.
Elizabeth Roper, Partner | Baker & McKenzie LLP
Elizabeth Roper is a partner at Baker McKenzie and a member of the firm’s Cybersecurity, Data Privacy, and Technology practice. She advises multinational organizations on cybersecurity incidents, data privacy compliance, and complex regulatory investigations. Roper regularly counsels clients on responding to cyber incidents, managing data breaches, and navigating global privacy and cybersecurity laws. Her practice involves coordinating cross-border investigations, advising companies on regulatory obligations following cyber events, and helping organizations develop strategies to manage digital risk.
SESSION 1 – Article 4A and the Anatomy of Wire Fraud Litigation | 2:00pm – 2:30pm
Attorneys will examine how wire transfer fraud disputes arise under UCC Article 4A and Regulation J, reviewing common fraud scenarios including payment diversion and compromised email instructions, along with the claims and defenses typically asserted in bank-accountholder litigation.
SESSION 2 – The First 72 Hours After a Fraud: Recovery, Coverage, and Litigation Positioning | 2:30pm – 3:00pm
This session outlines the critical legal steps attorneys must take immediately following a BEC or wire fraud incident, covering bank recall coordination, law enforcement engagement, evidence preservation, and how early response decisions shape litigation posture and affect insurer and bank disputes.
Break | 3:00pm – 3:10pm
SESSION 3 – Business Email Compromise/Fund Transfer Fraud: Identifying and Responding to Current Threat Patterns | 3:10pm – 4:10pm
Attorneys will explore how modern BEC schemes operate, examining threat actor techniques, the industries most frequently targeted, indicators of active payment diversion, and practical response strategies including incident containment, FBI and FinCEN coordination, and organizational risk mitigation.